Brett Kavanaugh's use of the word 'emotional' exposes a gross double standard
Emotional. This is the word Brett Kavanaugh employed in an op-ed to describe his behaviour during his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
In an op-ed entitled "I Am an Independent, Impartial Judge" published in the Wall Street Journal, Kavanaugh characterised his conduct in the hearing as "emotional," perhaps, "too emotional at times." He prefaced this statement by saying that his testimony was a reflection of his "deep distress at the unfairness of how this allegation" of sexual assault was handled. Here, he is attempting to justify his behaviour and convince the American public that he is fit to serve. That he is, as the headline says, an "impartial judge."
SEE ALSO:Congrats to Brett Kavanaugh on getting to be angryBut it is Kavanaugh's use of this particular word that is most telling. It is a word with a legacy of gendered baggage. A word we typically associate with women's rage. A word that is often used pejoratively to denigrate and undermine women who display rage. Kavanaugh's decision to use this word highlights the gross double standard at play in our cultural acceptance of men's rage and our dismissal of women's anger.
Activists shout slogans during a protest against the confirmation of Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh October 4, 2018.Credit: Alex Wong/Getty ImagesOf course, it shouldbe permissible for women to admit when they are emotional — just as much as anyone of any gender should be allowed to express their emotions. But, we live in a patriarchy and that means some people are allowed to be emotional and others are not.
One of the many take-aways from the hearing was that there is a vast chasm of difference in standards of what's acceptable in men and women's behaviour. "What a study in contrasts," wrote the New York Timeseditorial board. "Where Christine Blasey Ford was calm and dignified, Brett Kavanaugh was volatile and belligerent; where she was eager to respond fully to every questioner, and kept worrying whether she was being “helpful” enough." Kavanaugh was "openly contemptuous of several senators" and "evasive" while Dr Ford was "credible and unshakable."
The very fact that Kavanaugh has chosen to employ this highly gendered term as a euphemism for his own patent volatility underscores the cultural "contrasts" in behavioural standards in society. "It's okay — even expected — for men to express anger," wrote Dr Kerri Johnson — professor of communication studies and psychology at UCLA — in a study on perceptions of gender and emotion. "But when women have a negative emotion, they're expected to express their displeasure with sadness." What Kavanaugh is saying here is this: I am allowed to be "emotional" (read: angry) because my family and I were wronged by these allegations. My anger, because it is male, is permissible.
Imagine for a moment that Dr Ford had conducted herself in the same way Kavanaugh. Imagine if she penned an op-ed afterwards describing her behaviour as "emotional." It's difficult to picture such a scenario. Not only because Dr Ford's conduct was so diametrically opposed Kavanaugh's, but because a woman would never willingly label her own behaviour as "emotional". It would be tantamount to hitting self-destruct.
"When a couple is having an argument, even if a woman has a well-thought-out reason for being upset, a guy might say, 'You’re just being emotional.'
"When a women shows anger in institutional, political, and professional settings, she automaticallyviolates gender norms," says Soraya Chemaly, author of Rage Becomes Her:The Power of Women's Anger. "When a man becomes angry in an argument or debate, people are more likely to abandon their own positions and defer to his. But when a women acts the same way, she’s likely to elicit the opposite response."
So, what does the word "emotional" mean when we apply it to women? Per Matthew Zawadzki — a professor at UC Merced specialising in perceptions of emotions — the term "emotional" is used to "label women whom you don’t want to have a voice in a situation."
"When a couple is having an argument, even if a woman has a well-thought-out reason for being upset, a guy might say, 'You’re just being emotional,'" Zawadzki told Refinery29. "It's a way to discredit her instead of having to listen; the words 'you’re acting crazy' really mean 'I don’t have to pay attention to you.'"
This word, when used to talk about women's rage, is redolent of our cultural disapproval of angry women. The emotional woman is a trope that many women do their utmost to avoid lest they be accused of acting in a way that might be deemed unprofessional, improper, and unjustified. "You're too emotional" is a sentence that many women will have heard in response to their expression of anger. It's a sentence we're all too familiar with and one that's used to undermine and silence.
Just as Kavanaugh has chosen to use the words "forceful and passionate" as ways of characterising his behaviour (and as palatable euphemisms for his anger) he is using the word "emotional" to try to humanise himself and regain control over people's perceptions of him. But, in doing so, he serves to remind women everywhere that he can do something they cannot. When a woman is "emotional" she is discredited, but when the same is said of a man, he's justified.
Brett Kavanaugh is an emotional man. And society has afforded him that privilege.
Featured Video For You
Across the globe, nasty women and men hit the streets one day after Trump's inauguration
-
We Bought the Cheapest DDR5 RAM Modules We Could Find, Are They Any Good?How to decide if you should confront that annoying coworker机动车道不能走 非机动车道不好走Juventus, the beating heart of Italy's Women's World Cup team25 Years Later: A Brief Analysis of GPU Processing EfficiencyRoku's new 4k streaming stick is just $70No, this NFL player didn't burn a U.S. flag in the locker room管理缺位、单据销毁,揭阳一老人组被村“两委”解散蒙顶山茶有了专属茶器就业不用到远方 致富就在家门口
下一篇:Campbell highlights Washington Declaration amid security concerns over Putin
- ·Number of COVID
- ·连续21年出口北美!汕头雷岭今年首批出口荔枝发车
- ·Young North Koreans increasingly favor wealth over loyalty to state
- ·KOA campgrounds will offer EV charging
- ·Is Mercury retrograde messing with you? Think again.
- ·There's a life
- ·连续21年出口北美!汕头雷岭今年首批出口荔枝发车
- ·15 extremely mild instances of vandalism
- ·实干担当抓落实 多措并举促发展
- ·UN special rapporteur for North Korea human rights to visit Panmunjom next week
- ·Pinterest is playing with live, shoppable videos. Here's how it works.
- ·“深汕友农”小程序商城开张迎客,一键下单,深汕美味到您家!
- ·'Hyundai Way': Auto giant's W121tr plan aims to seize mobility market lead
- ·搭建新平台 良好长效地开展老干部志愿服务工作
- ·No, this NFL player didn't burn a U.S. flag in the locker room
- ·N. Korea calls for strengthened cooperation among developing countries
- ·厚植精神文明沃土 培树司法文明新风
- ·6月26日相约广州海心沙,赴一场乡村音乐文化盛宴!
- ·Juventus, the beating heart of Italy's Women's World Cup team
- ·Well, turns out you can pack in a lot of mosquitoes without killing them
- ·7 Reasons to Explore Boston’s Lesser
- ·白内障手术宜早不宜迟
- ·Amir Khan's fight with Indian boxer Neeraj Goyat cancelled
- ·[Breaking] Fire breaks out at Yonsei Severance Hospital
- ·Tesla's big software update includes something called 'Night Curfew'
- ·6月26日相约广州海心沙,赴一场乡村音乐文化盛宴!
- ·Echo Dot (5th gen) deal — get it for $29.99 at Amazon
- ·FIFA appoints normalisation committee for the Pakistan Football Federation
- ·市食品药品监督管理局召开创建省级文明城市暨药械流通专项整治动员大会
- ·How to decide if you should confront that annoying coworker
- ·Pressure boost squeezes out more hydrogen from artificial leaves
- ·The DOJ wants to know if you liked this anti
- ·[Graphic News] Those in 20s, 30s least happy among age groups in S. Korea: Survey
- ·Mo Salah urged to leave Liverpool, move to Barcelona
- ·Washington Mystics vs. Chicago Sky 2024 livestream: Watch live WNBA
- ·KOA campgrounds will offer EV charging