John Paul Stevens, maverick and conscience of the Supreme Court, dies at 99.
Popular in News & Politics
- Alito’s Explanation for the Upside-Down American Flag Honestly Makes It Worse
- It’s Amazing What $60 Million Can’t Buy
- Think You’re Smarter Than a Slate Senior Editor? Find Out With This Week’s News Quiz.
- The Judicial Arsonists Went Too Far for the Conservative Justices This Time
Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens died on Tuesday at 99. He was, in a thousand ways, the last gasp of an era.
Stevens was born on April 20, 1920, in Chicago, to a prosperous family that survived financial ruin in the 1930s. In the lobby of his family’s downtown Chicago hotel, the young John Stevens crossed paths with the likes of Amelia Earhart and Charles Lindbergh. He lived his youth through the Jazz Age, the beginning and the end of Prohibition. He was, famously, in the stands of Wrigley Field with his father when Babe Ruth hit his called shot during the 1932 World Series.
After enlisting in the Navy and serving as a code breaker in World War II, Stevens was awarded a Bronze Star for his service. He was, in fact, the last sitting Supreme Court justice to have served in the military. He went to Northwestern Pritzker School of Law on the GI Bill and graduated magna cum laude with the highest GPA in the history of the school at that time.
Stevens was appointed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7thCircuit in 1970 by President Richard Nixon and then to the U.S. Supreme Court five years later by President Gerald Ford. In what may be the highest praise any justice could aspire to, Ford wrote just before his own death in 2005: “I am prepared to allow history’s judgment of my term in office to rest (if necessary, exclusively) on my nomination thirty years ago of Justice John Paul Stevens to the U.S. Supreme Court.” The gentle white-haired former antitrust lawyer would surprise everyone, himself most of all, in becoming the left flank of a court he increasingly claimed he didn’t quite recognize.
AdvertisementStevens retired in 2010, at age 90, as the third-longest-serving justice in the history of the court. In the coming days, you will hear a lot about his bowties, about his love of tennis, about the ways in which he drifted from the center-right to become, at the time of his retirement, the leader of the court’s left wing. But Stevens claimed that he never drifted anywhere; he held that the court had moved inexorably to his right while he steadfastly remained a moderate in the mold of Rockefeller Republicans of old.
Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementIndeed, it is difficult to imagine Stevens drifting anywhere he didn’t choose to go. At times he was a maverick, a frequent lone dissenter, unafraid to stand alone in his convictions. Once, in an interview, Justice Antonin Scalia was asked which justice was his favorite sparring partner, and he named Stevens. “I think you should give the dissenter the respect to respond to the points that he makes. And so did John Stevens,” Scalia explained. “So he and I used to go back and forth almost endlessly.” Stevens, however, was also a unifying leader who will be remembered for his unusually effective ability to unite the four more liberal-leaning justices against the conservative majority.
AdvertisementStevens was known for being the only justice to write his own first drafts, which he would pass along to his clerks with instructions along the general lines of “don’t let me look like an idiot.” For decades he was also the only justice to rely entirely on his own clerks’ recommendations about which cases the court should hear, rather than pooling his clerks with those of the other justices to review only a share of the petitions as all the other justices did. He reveled in debating with his young clerks, enthusiastically engaging their arguments and humbly treating them as intellectual peers.
AdvertisementBut only fools would underestimate Stevens. It was his trademark move to interject himself into the rough and tumble back-and-forth of oral arguments by politely inquiring of advocates, “May I ask a question?” and often apologizing for taking up counsel’s time. Yet, frequent court advocates would assure you that what followed was always the toughest and most probing question of the day. Paul Clement, who served as solicitor general under President George W. Bush, once said that it was always Stevens’ questions that put you “on your guard because he’s probably found the one issue that puts your case on the line.”
Advertisement AdvertisementStevens will be remembered by constitutional scholars for a series of dissents near the end of his career—in Bush v. Gore, in Citizens United, in District of Columbia v.Heller—where he wrote persistently and persuasively about his aspirations for constitutional democracy, citizenship, and speech. Dissenting in Bush v. Gorehe wrote—presciently—about the public loss of confidence in an impartial court:
Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementThe [majority opinion] can only lend credence to the most cynical appraisal of the work of judges throughout the land. It is confidence in the men and women who administer the judicial system that is the true backbone of the rule of law. Time will one day heal the wound to that confidence that will be inflicted by today’s decision. One thing, however, is certain. Although we may never know with complete certainty the identity of the winner of this year’s Presidential election, the identity of the loser is perfectly clear. It is the Nation’s confidence in the judge as an impartial guardian of the rule of law.
But for anyone who knew him, Stevens will be remembered as a genteel and gentle steward of the law; a quiet force who believed in American values and hopes, even as they disappointed him, and who fought tirelessly to build an America that lived up to his extraordinarily high standards. For all those who knew and loved him, living up to those standards could itself represent a life well lived. In interviews he gave as recently as last fall, Stevens implored us all to be better than what we have become, and to see what is best in one another, rather than trade in sneering, shadowy whispers. His most recent book, The Making of a Justice: Reflections on My First 94 Years, was published this past May. In an interview just a couple of months ago, upon publication of that book, he expressed deep distress at the current political discourse: “You wake up in the morning and you wonder what’s happened.” His death, representing the demise of both a maverick and a gentleman, a Republican and also a Democrat, a deeply reverent patriot and also a clear-eyed critic, signals the end of so much that, sadly, feels irremediably lost already.
Tweet Share Share Comment-
NASA rover snaps photo of its most daunting challenge yetNorth Korea fires one short市市场监管局开展“八一”走访慰问活动村干部能干不能干 民主测评说了算Coach jailed for sexual exploitation of underage athleteNorth Korea continues to seek sanctions lifting, recognition as nuclear state东融成渝西向拓展 构建开放发展格局Best photo of the week: India’s police COVIDDoosan scraps controversial RoboticsOpen footwear in summer dangerous for diabetics, experts say
下一篇:Echo Dot (5th gen) deal — get it for $29.99 at Amazon
- ·How to Backup Your Gmail Account
- ·Why is Merrick Garland defending Donald Trump?
- ·China's Liang and Li given lifetime snooker bans
- ·CES 2023: Meet the selfie
- ·23 Peculiar Places of 2023
- ·再谋突破,援疆教师助力疏附县2024高考备考
- ·再谋突破,援疆教师助力疏附县2024高考备考
- ·Is Donald Trump going to face charges? Not yet, and maybe never.
- ·I went to an offline dating event for singles. Here's how it went.
- ·Best Dyson deal: Snag the Dyson Omni
- ·中国·雅安大数据产业园亮相智博会
- ·Stop telling Justice Breyer to retire.
- ·Slot extends perfect Liverpool start
- ·市市场监管局开展“八一”走访慰问活动
- ·CES 2023: Meet the selfie
- ·Veteran actor offers to donate land for late President Rhee Syng
- ·抖音超600万次传播量!广东省农事运动会乡村直播大赛火出圈
- ·Poll: Almost 30 percent of Republicans say they won’t get COVID
- ·返乡创业做电商 携手乡邻共奔康
- ·North Korea continues to seek sanctions lifting, recognition as nuclear state
- ·Cicadas love to land on people. Experts explain why.
- ·The recent climate change disasters might mean no one can go home again.
- ·North Korean media decries proposed South Korea
- ·Best photo of the week: India’s police COVID
- ·Microwave technique recovers 87% of batteries' lithium in 15 minutes
- ·Why police car chases keep killing people.
- ·Washington Mystics vs. Chicago Sky 2024 livestream: Watch live WNBA
- ·Confederate nostalgia, the Lost Cause, and the history of soybeans in the South
- ·关爱生命 红十字“救”在身边
- ·Vladimir Putin’s most unforgettable quotes.
- ·Pressure boost squeezes out more hydrogen from artificial leaves
- ·North Korea urges US to permanently stop joint military exercise
- ·Sexual assaults are happening in VR. What can we do about it?
- ·Why police car chases keep killing people.
- ·By a technicality, August's full moon is blue. Here's why.
- ·America invades Baghdad: How Iraqis experienced “shock and awe.”