What Apple's Supreme Court case means for the future of the App Store
Apple's App Store rules are about to come under a lot more scrutiny and that could be bad news for the company.
On Monday, the Supreme Court ruled that a group of consumers cansue Apple over App Store rules they say are anti-competitive. The groups who brought the suit say that because Apple's rules prevent apps from being distributed outside of the App Store, it creates a monopoly that lets Apple jack up the price of software in its store.
Now, although the latest decision was merely a procedural win -- Apple's lawyers had argued the case should be thrown out -- the fact that the case will move forward could eventually have significant implications for the App Store.
And, at a time when more and more officials are calling for the break-up of Big Tech, the fact that the court green-lit the case could be a worrying sign.
What could happen?
The original suit in the case dates back to 2011, so it's important to note that the Supreme Court decision is unlikely to change anything in the short term. If both sides opt to litigate, it could be another years-long legal battle. Apple could also decide to settle, much like it did in the Qualcomm case.
So while it's impossible to say exactly how this will play out, there are a few areas where Apple could, eventually, be forced to change its rules.
One scenario is that Apple could be forced to allow users to install apps from outside of the App Store, what's sometimes called "sideloading." This would be one of the more extreme outcomes, as it would mean the end of the company's so-called "walled garden." Apple has always been loath to do this, and has actually gone out of its way to punish developers who try to skirt its rules, going so far as to break all of Facebook's internal apps when it got wind of the company's attempts to "research" teens internet habits.
Apple often cites security reasons for this -- it can't guarantee that software outside of its App Store is safe -- but there's another huge reason why it wants to control app distribution: money. Apple takes a 30 percent cut of app sales and in-app purchases which, of course, it controls. If it were forced to allow other app stores, or let developers sell apps directly to users, it could potentially lose out on a significant amount of revenue.
Tweet may have been deleted
The same goes for in-app purchases. Because Apple requires all in-app purchases to be conducted through the App Store, developers automatically lose out on 30 percent, which is why some developers have tried to buck the App Store. This is why you can't buy Kindle books in Amazon's iOS app, for example, and Netflix no longer lets you sign up for its service in its app.
So another potential outcome of the case could be that Apple will have to allow alternative methods for in-app purchases. This is the scenario that some pundits think is most likely, as it would satisfy some critics without fundamentally changing how Apple monetizes apps.
Apple could also theoretically be forced to change the amount it takes from developers. Instead of the 30 percent commission it gets now, it could be that a lower amount would be deemed more "competitive." But this seems less likely as Google also takes a 30 percent cut from its developers' app sales.
None of it is great for Apple
But we do know the Supreme Court decision is a blow to Apple. Quite simply, the App Store business is critical to Apple. That's long been the case, but as iPhone sales have slowed, the company has been trying to transition to a "services" focused business. (The company's last major event saw the launch of three new subscription services in gaming, news, and streaming.)
As the company attempts to get these new services off the ground, the App Store makes up a significant chunk of Apple's services revenue (which was $11.5 billion last quarter). If the company was forced to allow apps to be distributed by third-parties, or to loosen its grip on in-app purchases, for example, it could have a significant impact on that business.
Featured Video For You
Apple and Disney donate to help rebuild Notre-Dame Cathedral
TopicsApple
-
Michael Cohen fights Donald Trump at the Supreme Court.鐢垫殩瀹濈綉缁滄娊妫€鍚堟牸鐜囦笉瓒充笁鎴 瀛樻紡鐢甸殣鎮涓浗灞变笢缃慱闈掑矝大兴污水处理厂首次开放 让环保与公众“零距离”青岛市部分超市便利店提供“支付宝价”Campbell highlights Washington Declaration amid security concerns over Putin中国首个丝苗米基因大数据发布!助增城以“发源地”为本谋划丝苗米产业高质量发展!全市乡镇人大主席培训会召开鎴愬搧娌逛环鈥滀簲杩炶穼鈥 浠婂勾宸茬粡鍘?5杞皟浠穇涓浗灞变笢缃慱闈掑矝We Bought the Cheapest DDR5 RAM Modules We Could Find, Are They Any Good?青岛市部分超市便利店提供“支付宝价”
- ·NCT member Taeil leaves band over sexual offense allegations
- ·网上定制白酒一块钱一度酒 性价比个性化成卖点
- ·专精专研“一条鱼”事业,百香顺打造黑鱼片爆品竞逐万亿蓝海!
- ·英德红茶,清远鸡入选!第二批地理标志助力乡村振兴典型案例出炉
- ·Scientists detect water sloshing on Mars. There could be a lot.
- ·黄金消费未出现炒金热潮 黄金理财产品遇冷
- ·“新蓝领”平均月薪达到3163元 司机薪资最高
- ·网上定制白酒一块钱一度酒 性价比个性化成卖点
- ·Pope says England are not 'one
- ·重磅!2023中国种猪精液大赛来了!种猪场速看
- ·5月25日国内成品油价调整窗口将再度开启
- ·网上卖菜有发财的有歇菜的 平台选择至关重要
- ·[Graphic News] Average book price nears 20,000 won
- ·一课难求!这届打工人抢着上夜校
- ·澶ц懕浠锋牸澶ц穼鍒涜繎骞翠箣鏈€ 棰勮骞村唴鎸佺画浣庝环杩愯
- ·“珠连璧合”,珠海连州商会携供港澳商家考察连州菜心
- ·World's first green ammonia plant is now open for business
- ·“新蓝领”平均月薪达到3163元 司机薪资最高
- ·1至4月 我市完成白蚁防治超10万平方米
- ·青岛部分银行利率悄回落 业内:资金成本压力大
- ·雅安公安接连破获两起汉源湖非法捕捞案
- ·发挥资管业务优势 促进交行转型发展
- ·澶ц懕浠锋牸澶ц穼鍒涜繎骞翠箣鏈€ 棰勮骞村唴鎸佺画浣庝环杩愯
- ·二套房首付降低至四折 你要买房还是理财?
- ·Michael Cohen fights Donald Trump at the Supreme Court.
- ·我市加快农业服务业发展 有序推进“信息进村入户”工程
- ·[Graphic News] Average book price nears 20,000 won
- ·科普惠民 改变你我的生活
- ·银行净利进入“微增”时代 新造血点目标亟待拓展
- ·贯彻实施《信访条例》 依法反映信访诉求
- ·Freedom from Dissent
- ·鍙?1鍓嶅璺ㄥ鐢靛晢鍏ㄩ潰鐖嗗彂 涓氬唴鐩磋█鍋囪揣浠嶆槸琛屼笟鐥涚偣
- ·鍥藉唴娌逛环灏嗚繋涓夎繛娑 姹芥补姣忓崌鎴栦笂璋?.20鍏僟涓浗灞变笢缃慱闈掑矝
- ·限额15家!2023年粤港澳大湾区最受欢迎品牌猪肉品鉴评选活动开始接受报名
- ·The Wonderful World of Christmas Trees
- ·发挥整体优势 推动经济繁荣