Could the coronavirus lead to a global cease
Popular in News & Politics
- The One Thing Donald Trump Can’t Escape in Court
- Cohen’s Testimony Hints At a Strategic Move From the Prosecution in the Hush Money Trial
- There Are Only Three Ways Out of Israel and Hamas’ War
- There’s an Insidious Legal Movement to Make Pregnant Women Second-Class Citizens
Slate is making its coronavirus coverage free for all readers. Subscribe to support our journalism. Start your free trial.
Could a side effect of the coronavirus be a more peaceful world, even just temporarily? It seems like a long shot, but there’s a glimmer of hope for an unprecedented proposal for a global cease-fire. A cease-fire would allow for humanitarian aid and cooperation to fight the virus, which is now affecting at least nearly every country on Earth.
U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres issued a call (later backed by Pope Francis) on March 23 for an “immediate global ceasefire in all corners of the world.” The members of the Security Council are currently debating the language of a resolution endorsing the call. French President Emmanuel Macron, who has been lobbying for the resolution, says four of the five permanent members of the council have expressed support for the resolution and is hopeful that Russian President Vladimir Putin, the last holdout, can be brought around. (Efforts to reach consensus on nearly anything related to the virus within the council have so far been stymied by the U.S.-China blame game.) The resolution might seem like a pipe dream, and even if it’s passed, it’s not a sure thing that we’ll suddenly achieve world peace. A brief look at global headlines in just the past two days—Russia buzzing U.S. aircraft in the Mediterranean, North Korea firing short-range missiles, rising tensions in the Persian Gulf—make that clear. But there’s still reason to take the cease-fire idea seriously.
Richard Gowan, U.N. director at the International Crisis Group, a think tank that studies armed conflict, told Slate that he and his colleagues were initially “quite cynical” about Guterres’ cease-fire proposal, but that “it did seem to resonate with a wider range of armed groups than we expected.” Rebel groups in the Philippines, Thailand, Cameroon, and Colombia have all announced unilateral cease-fires as a result of the coronavirus. In some cases, notably Sudan, the cease-fire call was endorsed by parties already involved in peace talks. In Ukraine, both the government and the Russian-backed rebels fighting in the country’s east have endorsed the call, but violence has continued.
AdvertisementGowan stresses that “None of the armed groups we’re talking about have somehow discovered morality and become angelic.” They’re using cease-fires opportunistically to buy time, regroup after battlefield setbacks, or buy some good publicity. But it can still be a “useful tool for U.N. envoys to nudge some conflict parties toward peace or at least humanitarian pauses,” he said.
Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementThe most significant entity to announce a cease-fire so far was the Saudi-led (and U.S-backed) coalition in Yemen, which has been fighting a brutal war against the Iran-aligned Houthi rebels for more than five years. With its devastated health system, poor sanitation, and lack of central authority, Yemen—which confirmed its first coronavirus case last Friday—is one of the world’s most vulnerable countries to the disease. Saudi Arabia, which may be looking for a way to extricate itself from the costly conflict and has taken an economic hit from falling global oil prices, announced a two-week cease-fire on April 8, but the Houthis, who have made some recent battlefield gains, have not agreed to it, and fighting has continued on both sides. But Gowan hopes that the cease-fire call could give new momentum and urgency to ongoing U.N.-led peace talks. It’s not unusual for armed groups in Yemen and other similar conflicts to ramp up attacks ahead of cease-fires to increase their leverage.
AdvertisementAnother reason for skepticism about the cease-fire is that it seems almost impossible that the world’s major military powers will abide by it. There are some signs that the U.S. is using the pandemic as a pretext to draw down a bit from its “forever wars,” but it is still conducting airstrikes against Iranian backed militias in Iraq and launching raids against ISIS in Syria in cooperation with Kurdish forces. “The Coalition continues to support … anti-ISIS operations by sharing intelligence and providing eyes-in-the-sky, while we all face the challenge of preventing the spread of COVID-19,” a U.S. spokesman told Stars and Stripes about one recent raid.
AdvertisementThe U.S. will almost certainly insist on a carve-out for counterterrorist activities in any cease-fire call. This kind of carve-out has bedeviled past efforts to reach a cease-fire in Syria, given that Russia defines all opponents of the Assad regime as terrorists and justifies its airstrikes accordingly. Even France, the country most actively pushing for the cease-fire declaration, is probably not going to halt its ongoing operations targeting Islamist militants in West Africa.
Advertisement Advertisement“Everyone is going to have their special case of someone you can kill,” notes Gowan, who adds that there’s a risk it could be seen as “Western countries telling poorer countries to pause their conflicts while Western countries continue to run the military operations they want to run.”
There’s also likely to be disagreement over the question of sanctions, which many argue are a form of aggression and which countries like Iran and Venezuela are calling to be lifted in order to help combat COVID-19. Russia, under its own sanctions pressure, is likely to be amenable to that idea. The United States and its allies definitely won’t be.
It’s too early to tell what effect the virus will ultimately have on armed conflict. There is some precedent for natural disasters bringing an end to armed conflict. One frequently cited example is the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, which led to a peace deal between the Indonesian government and separatist rebels in the battered province of Aceh, ending a conflict that had killed more than 12,000 people.
But this was one isolated case—and the tsunami had the opposite effect elsewhere. The global nature of this disaster and the response to it seems more akin to Ronald Reagan’s famous musing in a speech to the United Nations that the only thing that could unify humanity would be “an alien threat from outside this world.”
This threat came from this world, but it would be nice to think it could still serve as a good reason for humans to at least take a timeout from killing each other.
Tweet Share Share Comment-
雨城区疾控中心提示:科学补碘 防治碘缺乏病Ronaldo salvages point for Man Utd against ChelseaA college course about Frank Ocean comes to UC Berkeley this fallSound Dimension's Soundots speakers stack like legosSouth Korean lawmakers brace for US election as Harris, Trump diverge on North KoreaAncelotti says Real Madrid history an advantageDefense Ministry dismisses N.K.’s missile claimThe cryptocurrency craze is causing a shortage that gamers aren't going to likeApple iPod: The First 10 Years of the Ubiquitous Media PlayerRonaldo salvages point for Man Utd against Chelsea
下一篇:CrowdStrike outage is still causing hundreds of flight cancellations daily
- ·How to unblock Xnxx for free
- ·Alcaraz youngest into ATP top 10
- ·看表演、赶大集、送文创……这周末在海心沙赚足了年味!
- ·Defense Ministry dismisses N.K.’s missile claim
- ·Scientists detect water sloshing on Mars. There could be a lot.
- ·Seoul, Washington, Tokyo to continue joint nuclear efforts
- ·Seoul issues protest against Tokyo's textbook authorization
- ·'Vietnam an example for North Korea'
- ·How to Backup Your Gmail Account
- ·North Korean leader arrives home after summit
- ·Kim inspects landing drills, orders enemies be buried at sea
- ·Coast Guard, Navy conduct interdiction drill on suspected ship
- ·[Online Predators] Deepfake pornography haunts S. Korea
- ·U.S. urges N.K. to refrain from provocative rhetoric after threats
- ·Japan not drafting UN resolution on Pyongyang's human rights abuse
- ·North Korean leader to leave Hanoi on Saturday morning: source
- ·A Global Tour of Bakeries With Fascinating Histories
- ·选购增科新选丝苗1号增城丝苗米,认准这10家经销商
- ·Spyware creator arrested for allegedly creeping on thousands for 13 years
- ·China's premier says diplomacy can maintain regional stability
- ·Best Labor Day mattress deals in 2024
- ·Seoul issues protest against Tokyo's textbook authorization
- ·Sound Dimension's Soundots speakers stack like legos
- ·North Korea goes to polls to approve new parliament lineup
- ·Project 2025 Comstock Act: Trump’s new abortion comment exposed.
- ·GoPro announces layoffs, end of drone business
- ·AirPods Pro 3 and AirPods 4 may get revealed at the Apple September event
- ·Vietnam deports Kim Jong
- ·Seoul envoy to U.N. warns of tougher sanctions for additional N.K. provocations
- ·Ronaldo salvages point for Man Utd against Chelsea
- ·Prime exclusive deal: $50 off Govee floor lamp
- ·North Korea goes to polls to approve new parliament lineup
- ·Meet Yasmeen: Namibia’s star cricketer
- ·Sanders praises Trump for North Korea peace efforts
- ·Wordle today: The answer and hints for August 27
- ·Moving moment Kate Middleton hugs crying mum of autistic boy