Confronting domestic terrorism means confronting white nationalism.
More on New Zealand Mosque Shootings
- White Nationalists Are Debunking White Supremacy
- Christchurch Massacre Suspect Pleads Not Guilty to All Charges
- Why It’s a Big Deal That PewDiePie Disavowed a Meme Beloved by White Supremacists
- Candace Owens Is Bad. The Republicans Who Invited Her For Testimony Are Worse.
As a Muslim American, I was particularly struck by news of Friday’s harrowing attacks at New Zealand mosques. With at least 49 worshippers dead and the attack livestreamed on Facebook, this latest massacre epitomizes the surging white supremacist violence that has targeted racial and religious minorities here and abroad. Here in the United States, the October mass shooting at Pittsburgh’s Tree of Life synagogue, the 2017 bombing of a Minnesota mosque, and the 2015 massacre targeting black parishioners at a Charleston, South Carolina, church all point to the gravity of the threat. Like other Muslim Americans, I not only grieve the loss of so many lives but fear that white nationalist violence will continue to imperil our own communities at home.
AdvertisementBut as a scholar of national security law, I worry that political leaders in the United States will respond to the swell of white nationalist violence with the wrong solutions. Law enforcement officials must absolutely do more to counter white nationalist terrorism. But some proposed solutions, like calls for expanded federal terrorism charges, are both unnecessary and prone to abuse. Moreover, a focus on reforms of the penal code deflects attention from the political dynamics that have fueled and mobilized white nationalist movements here and elsewhere—especially the racist rhetoric and policies of President Donald Trump and like-minded demagogues.
Even before recent U.S. incidents, studies from the Government Accountability Office, criminologists, and the New America Foundation documented a sizable death toll from far-right violent extremist incidents. And media investigations showed that new neo-Nazi groups like the Atomwaffen Division are engaging in paramilitary exercises and encouraging members to acquire military training to prepare for a race war. But even during the Obama administration, intelligence agencies often ignored right-wing threats for political reasons.
Any serious response to white nationalist violence must challenge the presidential rhetoric and policies that embolden its supporters.These domestic extremist threats are prompting new and deserved attention. Following the arrest last month of Christopher Hasson, a Coast Guard lieutenant and self-declared white nationalist who stockpiled weapons for a potential terrorist attack, a former national security official and a U.S. attorney both advocated laws to create new federal terrorism charges to address such threats. While well-intentioned, these proposals misfire for several reasons.
Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementFirst, law enforcement officials do not need new terrorism charges to counter domestic extremists. Prosecutors already have hundreds of federal criminal charges at their disposal, which they have used to prosecute Charleston shooter Dylann Roof; Charlottesville, Virginia, assailant James Alex Fields; and Hasson. In addition, prosecutors already use Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act charges to seize assets of domestic terrorist groups and increase penalties against their members. And the FBI can already conduct far-reaching investigations of domestic organizations based on relatively low levels of suspicion.
Second, and relatedly, these new proposed laws create a potential for abuse. Consider, for instance, the recent proposal to make it a federal terrorism crime to kill, assault, or destroy property with the intent “to intimidate or coerce a civilian population” or “affect the conduct of a government.” Pitched as a modest proposal, such a law could actually convert a large number of ordinary crimes to federal terrorism offenses and ratchet up sentences. For instance, acts of violence designed to intimidate people, but with no political motive, could fall within the statute—as might attempts to threaten a judge in an individual child custody case in order to affect judicial conduct. Moreover, in light of federal agencies’ history of targeting civil rights activists and communities of color, there is no guarantee that federal agents would aim expanded charges at white nationalists, rather than Black Lives Matter members, indigenous rights activists protesting oil pipelines, or Muslims.
Advertisement AdvertisementThird, government officials can properly stigmatize white supremacist violence as “terrorism” without adopting new charges. For instance, prosecutors labeled Hasson, the Coast Guard lieutenant, a potential “domestic terrorist,” even though they charged him with firearms and drug possession charges. Thus, government officials can extend the moral stigma of terrorism—often reserved for Muslims—to other perpetrators without new laws.
AdvertisementSo what can the government do to address the threat of white nationalist violence? To start, the government has to monitor and assess a problem it has often ignored. Even now, the Justice Department only reports statistics on terrorism crimes with an international nexus, omitting attention to most U.S. terrorists while stoking fears of immigrants and Muslims. Law enforcement agencies must direct greater investigative attention and resources to the problem. For example, the military must curb the participation of service members in extremist hate groups like Atomwaffen. In addition, social media platforms must counter online incitement far more effectively than they have so far.
AdvertisementBut ultimately, any serious response to white nationalist violence must challenge the presidential rhetoric and policies that embolden its supporters. Trump’s tweets extending condolences to the people of New Zealand do nothing in the face of years of hateful statements and policies directed at Muslims and immigrants and the promotion of ideas of white “cultural threat,” popular among white nationalists. If members of Congress want to get serious about right-wing extremism, they should begin by defunding the Muslim travel ban and overturning Trump’s veto of national emergency powers to build a border wall. Rescinding racist policies and holding accountable the president who issues them will do more for the security of U.S. racial and religious communities than misguided attempts to create new terrorism laws.
Tweet Share Share Comment-
13 Places to Find Little Legends and Compact CryptidsScientists just found a fascinating EarthMan Utd down Betis in Europa3rd teen falls to death in five days in Seoul's Gangnam WardCampbell highlights Washington Declaration amid security concerns over PutinParliamentary committee passes revision bill aimed at supporting home rental scam victimsHow S. KoreaHow much do we shapePrime exclusive deal: $50 off Govee floor lampThe 2020 election, voter suppression, and democracy: Can America hold real elections?
- ·South Korean lawmakers brace for US election as Harris, Trump diverge on North Korea
- ·Sour Starbursts and French Pokémon: The 8 best tweets of the week
- ·Tiger Woods' ex
- ·[Contribution] Uzbekistan chooses path of protecting human rights, freedoms
- ·Update your BIOS: Utilities from Top Motherboard Makers
- ·What is digital redlining, and how is Facebook involved?
- ·农度丨拍视频和看视频的乡村妇女,命运的齿轮已开始转动
- ·Neil Gorsuch and the Supreme Court's conservatives are pushing crazy election law theories.
- ·Pope says England are not 'one
- ·Scientists just found a fascinating Earth
- ·Google I/O 2022: Pixel Buds Pro confirmed, Pixel 7 and Pixel Tablet teased
- ·Yoon vows to work toward fair opportunities for disabled people
- ·'Terminator Zero' creators find fresh life in sci
- ·Neil Gorsuch and the Supreme Court's conservatives are pushing crazy election law theories.
- ·Pentagon chief: US will look at resuming military drills with S. Korea depending on NK move
- ·Seoul to run ‘booknic’ sites at Han River
- ·Sports minister says audits into football, badminton federations set to conclude in Sept.
- ·Elon Musk might become temporary Twitter CEO
- ·Best deals of the day Feb. 14: AirPods Max, 2021 iPad, Arlo video doorbell, and more
- ·The lucky breaks that prevented an election meltdown.
- ·Freedom from Dissent
- ·Mbappe's PSG reflect on latest failure
- ·North Korea tightens quarantine inspection on imported materials amid virus concerns
- ·[Contribution] Uzbekistan chooses path of protecting human rights, freedoms
- ·How much will PCB's Champions Cup mentors be paid?
- ·Kvaratskhelia magic moves Napoli 18 points clear
- ·Campbell highlights Washington Declaration amid security concerns over Putin
- ·When will we know election results: Go to bed.
- ·North Korea tightens quarantine inspection on imported materials amid virus concerns
- ·Worst presidential transition periods: Remembering the 1860 shift from Buchanan to Lincoln.
- ·Wordle today: The answer and hints for August 29
- ·雅安市田家炳中学:为学生发放奖学金 鼓励学子奋勇拼搏
- ·3rd teen falls to death in five days in Seoul's Gangnam Ward
- ·共同推动产权交易合作
- ·50 Places to Eat and Drink Before You Die
- ·石棉县:抓牢“三个层面”做好冬季校园疫情防控