New York Trump trial April 15 start on track after judge rejects immunity.
On Wednesday, New York Justice Juan Merchan issued a no-holds-barred order rejecting Donald Trump’s final realistic effort to postpone his criminal trial in the Stormy Daniels hush money case. His stiff rebuke, offered less than two weeks before jury selection is set to begin, means that Trump’s first criminal trial is almost certain to start in Manhattan April 15.
The harshness with which Merchan dealt with Trump’s latest delay ploy also demonstrates that the judge is finished with indulging the sorts of bad-faith tactics Trump’s legal teams have used in the past to delay justice—and, unlike other judges in these matters, is not afraid to say so. (The trial has already been delayed once, from March 25 to April 15.)
AdvertisementAt issue in the ruling was a request from Trump’s legal team to postpone his Manhattan trial until after the Supreme Court on April 25 hears Trump’s disastrously broad argument that he is immune from all criminal prosecution for actions he took with regard to the Jan. 6 insurrection because, he asserts, he was acting within the scope of his presidential duties. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg has claimed that Trump filed fraudulent financial documents as part of a scheme to cover up an alleged affair with adult film performer Daniels in order to unlawfully influence the upcoming 2016 election.
How was that part of his presidential duties, and how is it related to his arguments about his Jan. 6 immunity, you might ask? The clearest answer is that it’s simply not. Trump asserts that tweets he sent while president—posts that Bragg alleges were attempts to coerce witnesses as part of his cover-up—were related to his executive responsibilities, making the case akin to one the Supreme Court will hear later this month. But Trump’s immunity claim in this case is so absurd that it was swiftly rejected when he tried to remove the case to federal court last year, and he quickly thereafter dropped his federal appeal of the issue.
AdvertisementMerchan did not find it necessary even to make any determination on the merits of Trump’s “immunity via Tweets” claim, even as Bragg’s office swatted it down in a response to Trump’s motion. Instead, Merchan pointed out, Trump had monthsto raise this argument, which he tried and failed to use in federal court, and waited to do so until 17 days before his trial was due to start, making it an untimely filing.
Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementWhy is he bringing it back up now? Because Trump’s legal team has been so far successful at delaying each and every one of his criminal trials with ridiculous arguments like this. The team’s strategy appears to be to delay these trials as much as possible, in the hope of quashing them entirely if and when Trump is restored to the White House in November’s election.
AdvertisementJudges in the former president’s other cases have been circumspect about calling out this obvious behavior by Trump, even as they have ultimately rejected his arguments for delay. Not so with Merchan, who stated, as bluntly as you could possibly expect from a judge:
AdvertisementFurther, and as an aside, the fact that the Defendant waited until a mere 17 days prior to the scheduled trial date of March 25, 2024, to file the motion, raises real questions about the sincerity and actual purpose of the motion. After all, Defendant had already briefed the same issues in federal court and he was in possession of, and aware that, the People intended to offer the relevant evidence at trial that entire time. The circumstances, viewed as a whole, test this Court’s credulity.
A judge telling a lawyer or defendant that they’re testing the court’s credulity is as close, without the imposing of sanctions, as you’ll get to the judge calling them a liar. It shows, on the eve of trial, that Merchan may be the most unyielding and pertinacious jurist Trump has encountered so far. Trump has also likely done himself no favors with Merchan by issuing repeated personal attacks on the judge’s daughter, actions that caused the judge earlier this week to amend a gag order against Trump to include the family of court staff.
Related From Slate
Susan Matthews
It’s Time to Give Up the Lie We Keep Telling Ourselves About Donald Trump
Read MoreAlthough Wednesday’s rejection of this adjournment request is not Trump’s final delay tactic here, it was likely his best hope that the case might be put on ice if Merchan wanted to see how the Supreme Court ruled before moving forward. Trump’s final delay tactic, an ongoing request that the trial be adjourned due to excessive “pretrial publicity,” is even more ridiculous than his immunity effort, though, and that is going nowhere. As Bragg’s office noted Wednesday in response to Trump’s adjournment request, “It would be perverse to reward defendant with an adjournment based on media attention he is actively seeking.”
Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementWhat is Trump’s next move? He could try to take his immunity fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, specifically with regards to this trial rather than the Jan. 6 trial, though that would almost certainly be a nonstarter. It’s true that the court is keeping his Jan. 6 trial on hold while it considers his potential criminal immunity for “official acts” while in office. But the two cases are radically different in key ways. First, and perhaps most importantly, Trump raised immunity early and often in the Jan. 6 case; here, by contrast, he failed to bring it up until the eleventh hour. In legal terms, that means he forfeited the defense and can no longer wield it against the New York charges. The law in this area is murky, largely because Trump’s lawyers simply made up the concept of presidential immunity from prosecution out of whole cloth. But even under Trump’s maximalist conception of the (fake) doctrine, it serves as an affirmative defensefrom criminal charges. These defenses are still subject to the usual principles of timeliness. And Merchan has definitively shown that the former president waited far too long to invoke the claim, weaponizing it at the last minute in a bad-faith bid to thwart justice.
AdvertisementPopular in News & Politics
- The Lawyer Defending Idaho’s Abortion Ban Irritated the One Justice He Needed on His Side
- You Don’t Want to Know How It’s Going Between Trump’s Lawyers and the Judge Presiding Over His Criminal Case
- We’ve Been Entertaining an Illusion About the Supreme Court. It’s Finally Been Shattered.
- Prosecutors Are Finally Revealing Their Strategy Against Trump
Second, and just as importantly, the former president’s claim to immunity here is even weaker than in the Jan. 6 case—and it is laughably feeble there too. Recall that Trump claims he’s owed immunity from prosecution for any actions with the “outer perimeter of the president’s official duties.” The Jan. 6 prosecution, which Merchan evocatively dubs the “federal insurrection matter,” does cite a handful of actions that arguably touch upon executive duties, albeit in a corrupt fashion. For instance, special counsel Jack Smith’s indictment cited Trump’s failed coercion of the Department of Justice to cook up a bogus investigation into alleged voter fraud. This was not, of course, a legitimate or permissible exercise of executive power; nonetheless, presidents do have constitutional authority over the DOJ, so Trump insists that his crooked meddling fell within the “outer perimeter” of his responsibilities.
Advertisement AdvertisementBut what, exactly, touched on the president’s official duties here? Arranging for Michael Cohen to pay hush money to a porn actor before the 2016 election? Reimbursing Cohen while in office? Falsifying his own business and financial records to prevent the public from learning about the payoff? It is impossible, at least with a straight face, to suggest that these acts are executive responsibilities. Sure, Trump can try to take this argument to the Supreme Court to get the justices to delay the New York trial as they’ve delayed the Jan. 6 trial. But the argument here is much thinner. This case has nothing to do with presidential power and everything to do with one man’s corrupt, sordid lies.
Tweet Share Share Comment-
What Ever Happened to Winamp?打响“雅安藏茶”品牌打造产城发展新格局Holocaust denial is now banned on Facebook12 best tweets of the week, including beans and Keanu ReevesAbrar Ahmed returns as Pakistan names squad for second Test against BangladeshSwiatek seeks to dominate WimbledonFacebook is merging Messenger with Instagram's direct messagesSean Hannity's texts to Paul Manafort, the abridged edition.18 Places for Epic Outdoor Adventure Across ColoradoTrump kicks off 2020 reelection bid promising to cure cancer, land on Mars.
下一篇:Garmin Fenix 8 vs. Apple Watch Ultra: The Fenix wins big on battery life
- ·夏凤俭与四川建安工业有限责任公司董事长耿海波座谈
- ·LG unveils air purifier face mask
- ·Current, former USFK employees under investigation on graft charges
- ·Study reveals the simple way people get around Facebook's fact
- ·Where to pre
- ·Roy Moore announces second bid for Alabama Senate seat.
- ·“以租代买”新租赁经济正在我市兴起
- ·Facebook will temporarily ban political ads after the election
- ·First officially approved Gen IV nuclear reactor in the US breaks ground
- ·Fears grow of radiation leak from N. Korea's nuke site
- ·Trump kicks off 2020 reelection bid promising to cure cancer, land on Mars.
- ·Then and Now: 5 Generations of GeForce Graphics Compared
- ·US Open 2024 livestream: How to watch US Open tennis for free
- ·WhatsApp wants to warn you about text messaging scams
- ·Lukaku 'happy' ahead of Inter return
- ·iPhone users can use Live View in Google Maps to better share locations
- ·Best smart home deals this week
- ·Obama says he has a finsta and now everyone is trying to find it
- ·Obama says he has a finsta and now everyone is trying to find it
- ·Moon highlights peace in UN speech
- ·抖音超600万次传播量!广东省农事运动会乡村直播大赛火出圈
- ·‘Last tickets to be sold from July 5’
- ·Everything coming to Amazon Prime Video in December
- ·Disney+ Day: All the news from Star Wars, Marvel, and more
- ·Who is the Dark Wizard in 'The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power' Season 2?
- ·Tesla to launch Full Self Driving beta to select drivers next week
- ·夜间献血模式“上线”
- ·Sean Hannity's texts to Paul Manafort, the abridged edition.
- ·Stephen Colbert's election website shows you how to vote state
- ·Facebook will temporarily ban political ads after the election
- ·Apple Watch bands: 5 favorites to consider as Apple Watch 10 looms
- ·North Korea denounces new UN sanctions
- ·Man redesigns iPhone home screen in the style of MS Paint, with glorious results
- ·Twitter to limit retweets of politicians' misinformation
- ·Supercritical geothermal power: Limitless promise or impossible dream?
- ·How to Watch Netflix with Friends Anywhere (and No, It's Not Illegal to Share Your Password)