Researchers may be self
Climate scientists may be self-censoring in order to get their work funded through government grants.
New data released by NPR this week shows that grants and research proposals from the National Science Foundation (NSF) using the term "climate change" in their title or summary have dropped by 40 percent this year when compared to 2016.
SEE ALSO:Shocking no one, the EPA's Scott Pruitt denies findings of new climate science reportThat's only 302 grants using the term this year compared to 520 last year, NPR reported.
And according to researchers, that reduction might have everything to do with a political climate that's hostile to their work.
Jacquelyn Gill, assistant professor of paleoecology at the University of Maine's Climate Change Institute, said in an interview Wednesday that the decrease is likely a self-preservation tactic. Scientists know that work concerning climate research is closely watched and certain terms flagged.
Gill said scientists are "often coached to talk about climate change without talking about climate change." So they communicate more specifically and avoid the politically-charged term.
"You want to protect the funding. You want to do the research. You want to avoid spurious lawsuits," she said, "but you also want to be make sure the work you are doing is impactful."
Gill worries that the balancing act will eventually eliminate climate change from the national dialogue, all because of this "language game." Even though the specific focus areas within climate research will persist, like extreme precipitation, drought, effects on animal behavior, and more, the overall umbrella term might morph over time.
The NSF, with a budget of $7.5 billion in fiscal year 2017, is one of the largest funders of climate science research in the U.S.
An NSF spokesperson said the organization doesn't comment on outside analyses, so they wouldn't weigh in on the declining use of the term.
To NPR, the same spokesperson added, "NSF takes no position on the language used by researchers to describe physical processes and outcomes if the merit review process judges the language to be appropriate.”
Not everyone thinks that scientists are censoring themselves to work around a hostile administration, however.
Texas A&M University atmospheric sciences professor Andrew Dessler has an alternate hypothesis of what's happening with the climate change proposals. He thinks the conversations and research about climate change are changing and becoming more specific as the science advances.
There's more to discover from narrower fields, such as "extreme weather," than the more all-encompassing concept of climate change.
"I'm skeptical that people are self-censoring," he said in an interview on Wednesday. Instead, the focus is shifting. Dessler said he would have no qualms about submitting a research grant proposal using the term "climate change."
NSF grants aren't the only space where "climate change" is slowly vanishing because of political pressure from the current administration. Look to the U.S. Department of Energy, which earlier this year asked researchers to remove "climate change" and "global warming" from project descriptions seeking funding approval.
Or there's the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which removed its extensive climate change website in April and has not fully restored it since. Both EPA administrator Scott Pruitt and Energy Secretary Rick Perry reject the mainstream climate science evidence showing that global warming is largely human-caused.
No matter what you call it or how hard you scrub government websites, the manifestations of climate change, with changing weather patterns, hotter temperatures, drought, and sea level rise, are still happening, and will only get worse with time.
Featured Video For You
Giant icebergs are a big tourist draw in Newfoundland, and a warning sign
-
Value Judgment小记者参观藏茶博物馆Your selfies won't look like shit anymore with an Android phoneMichael Kinsley on aging, baby boomers, and Trump.From Prairie Grasslands to Man漫画人生二十载,携手《南农》逐梦路S. Korea voices 'deep regret' over failed bid for new UN sanctions on N. KoreaDavid Frum on where the Republican Party can go after Trump.Trump trials: Jack Smith is reportedly reconsidering his strategy.Facebook's live sports ambitions add college football
下一篇:Newborns hit new low, but births to those unmarried reach record high: data
- ·“笋货”上市采购旺!清远西牛麻竹笋迎秋季尝鲜热
- ·YouTube has a surprising number of illegally streamed TV shows
- ·The Best Portable Apps for Your Software Toolbox
- ·Sarri targets first Juventus trophy against former club Napoli
- ·US Open 2024 livestream: How to watch US Open tennis for free
- ·Michael Kinsley on aging, baby boomers, and Trump.
- ·Consumer Reports is wrong about Microsoft’s Surface products
- ·一天太阳一天雨 一身尘土一身泥
- ·两个改造提升项目进入收尾阶段
- ·漫画人生二十载,携手《南农》逐梦路
- ·[Newsmaker] Singer Kim Gun
- ·Katy Perry walked the red carpet with quinoa stuck in her teeth. Trust no one.
- ·Travel Back in Time and Uncover Old
- ·S. Korea voices 'deep regret' over failed bid for new UN sanctions on N. Korea
- ·Will Twitter suspend Trump for his threatening North Korea tweets?
- ·A power struggle erased billions of dollars off Bitcoin, and it's about to get worse
- ·What to expect when a tech bubble bursts
- ·YouTube has a surprising number of illegally streamed TV shows
- ·Brains, grains and planes of Ukraine
- ·集中力量打好双攻坚战 提前全面建成小康社会
- ·Anatomy of a Keyboard
- ·Rashford 1 UK govt 0: footballer forces change on child poverty
- ·观察|“广明2号”的市场化之路
- ·惠州泓泉农业邀您品鉴优质猪肉!坚持粗粮慢养,沉淀原始的自然风味
- ·Scientists discover where the huge dinosaur
- ·护卫生命 368名医护人员挽袖献血
- ·GPU Mining is Dead, Where are my Cheap GPUs?
- ·N. Korea could announce end to nuke talks later this month: think tank
- ·一天太阳一天雨 一身尘土一身泥
- ·安全好吃,必享原味邀您12月11
- ·Cicadas love to land on people. Experts explain why.
- ·观察|“广明2号”的市场化之路
- ·US sends another surveillance plane over S. Korea: aviation tracker
- ·Will Twitter suspend Trump for his threatening North Korea tweets?
- ·Where to pre
- ·FBI: Hillary Clinton won't be charged in private email server scandal.