Donald Trump, Stormy Daniels trial: Trump’s defense options in the Alvin Bragg case are bad.
With the near completion of what may have been the most challenging and significant jury selection in American legal history, my former trial lawyer colleagues and I have been discussing the ways the upcoming Trump hush money trial will likely unfold. Notwithstanding the group’s collective high-level prosecutorial and white-collar defense trial experience—together spanning well over 100 years—our discussions have failed to answer a very basic question: What is the defense?
Defense lawyers always need a theory of their case to present to the jury in their opening statements, a construct that they try to build upon as they cross-examine key prosecution witnesses, call their own witnesses, introduce evidence, and sum it all up in their closing argument to the jury.
AdvertisementWere the witnesses against my client mistaken in identifying him as the perpetrator? In that regard, were the lighting conditions too poor, or was he too far away to allow accurate identification? Or, in white-collar cases, was my client relying on the advice of counsel or other trusted professionals when he did what he is accused of and thus acted without the requisite criminal intent? Or are the government witnesses all simply lying?
In theory, Donald Trump potentially had an advice-of-counsel defense—all three parties to the Stormy Daniels transaction at the core of the charges were represented by attorneys—but asserting that defense would require him to testify, something, as I have previously written in Slate, that he is manifestly incapable of doing. This is surely the case in the Alvin Bragg prosecution. Because taking the witness stand places a defendant’s credibility directly at issue, Trump’s doing so would open the door to cross-examining him about otherwise inadmissible, damning past conduct. The E. Jean Carroll debacle is just one of many skeletons he must keep in the closet.
AdvertisementTrump’s inability to testify precludes other potential “innocent state of mind” defenses, such as the oft-repeated claim that in his dealings with Daniels, he was looking only to protect Melania. Even though this would be tantamount to saying “I broke the law for family reasons,” it would require his testimony.
Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementAs a consequence, Trump’s lawyers will be left to argue that the prosecution’s case is based solely on the words of Trump-hating liars—no one more demonstrably so than Michael Cohen. The problem with this approach is that there will be many more damaging witnesses to confront, quite a few of whom who will be difficult to impeach. Any attempt to make the case all about Cohen will likely fail.
AdvertisementThe prosecution, although acknowledging Cohen to be a morally damaged witness, will surely argue that it was his willingness to lie, cheat, and steal for the boss that qualified him to be Trump’s attorney in the first place. Prosecutors will point out that Cohen’s testimony is directly supported by relevant documents and other witnesses, but they will do all they can to make their case much more reliant on other witnesses—perhaps going so far as to argue that even if the jury completely disregards Cohen’s testimony, the evidence against the former president is overwhelming.
Especially strong support for this position will come from David Pecker and Hope Hicks.
When it comes to the catch-and-kill scam at the heart of the case, and the threat to Trump’s 2016 election campaign posed by Daniels’ desire to tell the world her story, no other witness has more direct, explosive information than Pecker. As the editor of the scandal-driven National Enquirer magazine, he was a longtime close associate of Trump. Even before Daniels, Pecker and Trump had used the same catch-and-kill methodology—Pecker bought a scandalous story about a Trump affair seemingly for publication, then deep-sixed it—to conceal Trump’s extramarital tryst with former Playboy model Karen McDougal, now a witness for the prosecution.
Advertisement AdvertisementIn sum, except for Pecker’s understandable inability to identify the Trump Organization financial records falsely describing the payments at issue—entries that speak for themselves—Pecker can and will testify to everything he and Trump knowingly and intentionally did to illegally protect the candidate’s reputation as Election Day approached.
AdvertisementAs for Hicks, she is a powerfully credible witness who has honed her testimonial skills in congressional hearings and numerous other venues. As the White House communications director and a Trump confidante, Hicks participated in multiple telephone calls involving Trump and Cohen in which they discussed the threat posed by Daniels and the steps to be taken to silence her.
Though there is at least one, however underwhelming, area of cross-examination of Pecker—his reported immunity deal protected him from prosecution and could be argued as incentive for him to lie—there is simply no meaningful cross-examination of Hicks.
AdvertisementWith Pecker’s testimony likely preceding Cohen’s, to be followed later in the prosecution’s case by Hicks’ testimony, prosecutors can get what they need from Cohen while sandwiching him between two more believable and compelling voices, sharing parallel—and much more difficult to challenge—perspectives of the same damning story.
Advertisement AdvertisementRelated From Slate
Jeremy Stahl
Thursday Proved the True Difficulty of Picking Jurors to Assess Donald Trump
Read MoreInterwoven will be the predictably sympathetic testimony of the victims of the defendant’s catch-and-kill method to escape accountability: Daniels and McDougal. There will also be a host of others with documentary and testimonial support for the prosecution’s case.
Popular in News & Politics
- The Lawyer Defending Idaho’s Abortion Ban Irritated the One Justice He Needed on His Side
- You Don’t Want to Know How It’s Going Between Trump’s Lawyers and the Judge Presiding Over His Criminal Case
- We’ve Been Entertaining an Illusion About the Supreme Court. It’s Finally Been Shattered.
- Prosecutors Are Finally Revealing Their Strategy Against Trump
Are they all lying? When and where did this plot to falsely accuse an innocent man take place?
But didn’t I previously argue that the Bragg prosecution was the weakest of the four pending Trump indictments and, in an ideal world, would not go first? That is still the case, because the three other prosecutions involve far more serious charges and are relative slam-dunks (especially the two federal cases). The prime defect in the Bragg prosecution is a legal issue: whether, under the facts of this case, a state misdemeanor can become a felony. The trial judge, Juan Merchan, has already ruled in the district attorney’s favor on that matter, but this legal question will remain very much alive on appeal should Trump be convicted.
Trump’s public defense to galvanize his supporters—that the Bragg prosecution is all a scheme hatched by President Joe Biden and left-wing maniacs—won’t be tolerated in the courtroom. As a consequence, his trial team will be left without much. His best hope remains the presence of a recalcitrant juror or two willing and able to hang the panel.
Tweet Share Share Comment下一篇:Tesla's big software update includes something called 'Night Curfew'
- ·Yoon approves labor minister's appointment
- ·2019世界工业互联网大会暨青岛软博会召开在即 ABB将亮相
- ·提供多元化服务 为百姓办实事解难题
- ·5G高新视频主题高峰论坛及研讨会在青举行
- ·Top 10 Tech Pranks
- ·开展“智慧动监”业务培训 提升动物卫生监管能力
- ·激发书法兴趣 传承国学文化
- ·娴峰皵闆嗗洟鎬昏鍛ㄤ簯鏉帮細鈥滅墿鑱旂綉鏃朵唬锛屼紒涓氱殑鐩爣鏄垱閫犳洿澶氱殑缁堣韩鐢ㄦ埛銆傗€漘涓浗灞变笢缃慱闈掑矝
- ·Pope says England are not 'one
- ·青岛啤酒官方旗舰店荣膺天猫“2019年度酒类舰长”
- ·搜狐城市聚力青岛 加速释放区域品牌活力
- ·开学季来临,河北3所高校晒万台共享空调“成绩单
- ·South Korean lawmakers brace for US election as Harris, Trump diverge on North Korea
- ·经济观察:中国企业500强出炉 呈四大新变化
- ·“远东杯”扬帆青岛 8支赛队枕戈待旦全力备战
- ·驱动金融引擎 赋能价值创新 2019金融企业沙龙首场活动成功举办
- ·Yoon touts pension reform drive amid stagnant popularity rating
- ·全国首批!80余台载重二手车由青岛海关报关出口
- ·台东商圈又有新变化!利群商厦万达店开业
- ·市综合行政执法局城市治理重点工作做得咋样,来看这场通气会
- ·A Journey Into the Mind of Stephen King
- ·平安人寿青岛分公司:捐赠希望小学奖学金 爱在平安助梦起航
- ·两起行人被撞事故 责任划分截然不同
- ·展示乡镇魅力 助推乡村文化蓬勃发展
- ·中山古镇:到苏炳添家乡看“村BA”,来一场说走就走的美食之旅
- ·青岛市北区国林环保A股首发上市申请(IPO)顺利过会
- ·Aricell CEO arrested in first case under industrial accidents law
- ·中国工程院院士陈松林:突破基因组育种技术,推动海水鱼育种进程
- ·中国工程院院士陈松林:突破基因组育种技术,推动海水鱼育种进程
- ·海尔联合中国移动、华为正式发布全球首个智能+5G互联工厂
- ·Ford can make your Mustang Mach
- ·全市社会保险费征缴突破16亿元
- ·嗨爆夏夜!青岛奥帆中心国风市集街区正式开街
- ·鍙ら兘娲涢槼楗噧鍟ら厭婵€鎯咃紝闈掑矝鍟ら厭鑺傚紑骞曢€佹潵澶忔棩婵€鐖絖涓浗灞变笢缃慱闈掑矝
- ·Best tablet deals as of August 27
- ·中甲:穆里奇重炮克莱奥伤退 青岛黄海0